CoreWeave:
the 1.5% read.
Two market-derived prints — a round and a secondary — walked forward into a frozen pre-IPO mark. The Nasdaq open landed almost exactly on it. Then the same scorecard prints the names public data got badly wrong, because that gap is the product.
Mark, band, and the open
How the read happened
CoreWeave had what most private names lack: two market-derived prints in the year before listing. Where that flow exists, calibrated blending reads the clearing price almost exactly. Where it doesn't, the honest answer is a wide band — and sometimes a published miss.
What public data alone cannot see
The same model, the same rules, printed these errors. We publish them because they are the strongest argument for market-derived inputs.
Figma MISS
Last public print: a $12.5B tender, fourteen months before listing. The open implied $50B — −75.0% outside even the 95% band. No blend of stale prints could see a 4x re-rating; only live market data could.
Cerebras MISS
The last private round priced $8.1B eight months before a $70B open (−88.4%). The most spectacular gap in the dataset — and the clearest case that funding-round data is a floor, not a price.
Public prints are the audit trail, not the signal. The licensed feed exists to add what these misses lacked: continuous market-derived observations between rounds, calibrated by the same conformal machinery and scored on the same public scorecard. See the full scorecard →